(1) Over at x4mr's blog he has invested a number of posts in discussing what he refers to as "the border", a state lying somewhere between sleep and alertness. In more technical terms, it's the boundary between alpha and theta sleep, and also the point at which our brainwaves reach the same frequency as the lowest-frequency version of the Schumann resonance.
For those who visit it, the border is apparently a weird, wonderful and terrifying realm, a place where life-changing events can and do occur for those lucky, or unlucky, enough to experience them.
For whatever reason I have never been to the border ... apparently my sleep habits preclude it, and I just ram on through without ever noticing the border is even there. I seem to be in the majority in this regard.
Anyhow, what brought this to mind was an article in this morning's NY Times discussing the role sleep apparently has in helping us remember things ... and now I am wondering what it is those who have made journeys to the border remember that the majority of us do not, and why they have a need to remember it.
(2) Salon has an article (you may have to sit through a brief ad to get access) today about the more physical border to our south, and the possibility some of the same mercenary companies involved in Iraq may shortly be assisting along the US-Mexico border as well.
Blackwater, which is seemingly about to be evicted from Iraq for killing civilians and lying about it, is planning to open a large military-style training facility in the desert east of San Diego. Meanwhile, the company has been been lobbying for at least a couple years to get a stake in the border protection, as has rival DynCorp.
Maybe I'm being illogical here, but if we as a nation feel we need to spend more money on border security, why don't we agree to spend it on, you know, hiring and retaining more border patrol agents rather than funding private security companies with dubious track records? Or is national security yet another thing the administration thinks should be privatized, even if it costs more? (Which, presumably, would relegate the Border Patrol to yet another form of "socialized welfare".)
I'm not sure we need more guys with guns running along the border shooting at people while being outside any formal chain-of-command. That niche is already filled ... and while I think those guys are extremist kooks, at least they aren't taking millions of my tax dollars to provide their "services".
Politics, mostly national, some AZ, and whatever else hits my fancy.
About Me
- Sirocco
- I work as a software researcher. My political views are on the liberal side of the fence. Like many people, I consider myself an expert on all subjects, but in reality I am adequate in some, abysmal in most.
Some blogs I like
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(127)
-
▼
October
(13)
- Fits of whimsy
- Now for something completely different
- Feeling a draft
- Once more, with feeling!
- It's supposed to be "safe FOR democracy"
- Two borders
- SCHIP Shape
- Money matters
- Are we done yet?
- Maybe kids ARE better off without insurance
- Well, she's right in one instance at least
- Some interrelated data
- A good month in Iraq
-
▼
October
(13)
3 comments:
Fascinating. I read the Times piece, and it always amazes me the gap between those in the pool and those who study the pool. The Navigator and I lack all the science and academic rigor, but we've been there.
The article misses much by not tying the states to frequencies. They aggregate into "deep sleep" and "REM" and "awake."
Uh, no. It is more refined. Just about everyone retires as pure passenger, and whatever happens happens. A navigator remains alert down the frequency corridor and acquires the ability to drive.
It's not for kids. I'd be interested in what Navigator would say, but everything I've accumulated says that passengers are safe. If you don't mess with the trip, the autopilot sticks to safe terrain.
I have no clue how the mechanism works or why it works, but there appears to be a protective filter that, in this context, only lets people go where they can handle, except for a certain set of tenacious persnickety folks who can't leave a scab alone.
San Diego doesn't want Blackwater, and there is an organized resistance but I haven't read anything lately on what is going on with it. Now that San Diego is on fire, maybe Blackwater will re-consider. You have to assume that as long as Bush/Cheney is around, there will be some contract somewhere worth hundreds of millions for Blackwater.
Good grief! Picking on the Minutemen.. how lame. The REAL a-holes along the border with guns are the drug cartels, so maybe Blackwater would come in handy after all.
Post a Comment